Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Reflections on Telepathy, Dr.Vallée's Cybernetic Control and the 'Non Local'

Reflections on Telepathy, Vallée’s Cybernetic Control and the ‘Non-Local’
By Giorgio Piacenza

Dr. Jacques Vallée proposes that, between different cosmic species (like Earth human and ET or even beyond a physically limited ET or an “other” kind of being that is illegible under simple physicalist anthropological biases), the distinction between the signifier and signified (the symbolic representation and its meaning) can be quite different or even arbitrary and, thus, abductees can experience an incommensurability problem. And this would be why so often contacts manifest disconcerting degrees of “absurdity” to our human minds. (Read: “Incommensurability, Orthodoxy and the Physics of High Strangeness: A 6-layer Model for Anomalous Phenomena) http://bdigital.ufp.pt/bitstream/10284/781/1/223-239Cons-Ciencias%2002-8.pdf

I think that this would be more noticeable when there is little telepathic communication because telepathy by-passes or surpasses these semiotic limitations since, during telepathic communication, we are able to understand meaning more directly or intuitively (and many conceptual angles of it), included associated sensorial perceptions, images, personal interpretive translations, feelings and intentions. Considering the work of Mary Rodwell, this may be why many children with little understanding of comparative symbology apparently adapt with ease and make sense of what UFO intelligences are communicating with them.

Dr. Jacques Vallée also reminds us that wormholes are supposed to allow connections between times in the same universe, parallel universes, different universes that could be considered as different “dimensions” as in other realities. He aks SETI to consider that – the utilization of wormholes - would be useful for physical civilizations to cross vast distances as much as for time traveling civilizations, also for parallel universe civilizations, and perhaps civilizations from “other dimensions” to manifest in our known physical world. (Again, read: “Incommensurability, Orthodoxy and the Physics of High Strangeness: A 6-layer Model for Anomalous Phenomena”) http://bdigital.ufp.pt/bitstream/10284/781/1/223-239Cons-Ciencias%2002-8.pdf

He asks SETI and Ufologists not to limit in an anthropocentric way what the intelligences behind UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, a less prejudiced term for “UFO”) can be and do. Their semiotics could be based on different adaptations. Thus, I think that a necessary way to surpass this limitation would be – by necessity - the universal adoption of telepathy, a capacity that also surpasses the limitations of local space-time restrictions.

And from a systems and cybernetics perspective, posits that the UAP/UFO intelligences phenomenon produces interventions that affect our culture…a “control system” in terms of cybernetics. Moreover, while we could take this phrase “control system” to mean a surreptitious and Machiavellian, manipulative, in cybernetics, a “control system” is not necessarily negative and only for the benefit of one of the parts. Furthermore, Dr. Vallée sometimes reminds us that “they” can also be counter affected. Since control (meaning intelligent control) depends on intelligence and quite likely on awareness, the control of our own system would depend on how much awareness we have to be capable of a change in direction, similar to exerting change over acceleration (or over the rate of change), what would be a third derivative in terms of Newtonian mechanics (as the inventor of the Bell Helicopter, Arthur Young, author of “The Reflexive Universe” would show). First, there is position in spacetime coordinates, then the first derivative, velocity; then the second derivative, acceleration; then the third derivative: change of acceleration, which normally implies intelligent cybernetic control. http://www.arthuryoung.com/ruexc.html

Considering (under experiencer-testimonies) the characteristics of intelligent, living spacetime-surpassing “UFO” vehicles and (also under experiencer-testimonies) the integrative, non-mechanical characteristics of a science in which “things” and “subjects” are less distinguishable, the level of awareness that would be needed to exert control, not only on simple physical changes of acceleration of inanimate Newtonian objects but on self-constructing, complex, living societies would have to be non-local…like a 4th Derivative, a higher order extension of “Position” (beyond and inclusive of it) occupying a non-local position outside of spacetime coordinates.

It would be a “situated awareness” rather and, by that, the intelligence needed to exert “control” in the physical world would have to be aware of being aware that it is reflexively intelligent, thus not only able to intelligently control changes of acceleration in physical objects and, thus, to intelligently modify matter in a mechanical way, but also able to control changes in organized, intelligent systems organized by the non-local, experiential interactions of conscious subjects-objects. This would entail awareness of intimate, meaningful (in fact, living) non-local connections that blend subjectivity and objectivity (in a more ontologically symmetrical level) and which can change (less ontologically symmetrical) system-related probabilities. Moreover, this awareness itself would empower UAP/UFO conscious entities to exert influence in their own system and carefully blend it with ours for measured, precise interactions. Then again, own growing awareness rising up to that higher level of connectivity, would, in turn, exert influences on the UAP/UFO intelligences by consciously altering our response when our response is understood (also in Dr. Vallée’s terms) as part of those intelligences´ feedback system.

“I hesitate to be too specific. I'm speaking, as I'm sure you understand, of the attempted manipulation of UFO manifestations. It's a pretty tall order. We're assuming that there is a feedback mechanism involved in the operations of the control system; if you change the information that's carried back to that system, you might be able to infiltrate it through its own feedback.” (Jacques Vallée, http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc608.htm )

The UAP/UFO intelligences may interact and exert some influence while situated in a higher order and exert more influence (especially symbolic influence) while “coming down” to our order of things but, in doing so, they would also be exposing themselves up to be more influenced by us thus (in order to avoid our feedback to modify their own experiential probabilities) they would have one more good reason (besides our customary bellicose ways) for their semi-covert, cautious manners.
Giorgio Piacenza

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Usefulness of the Hyper Cube for Inter-Reality Connections?

Speculations about the Tesseract (Giorgio Piacenza).




After listening to a contactee friend (Ricardo Gonzalez) about working with the visualization of a Tesseract (hypercube) in order to manifest intention, while working in a coherent group effort with deeper levels of mind, I delved into geometry and found a relation with what Dr. Nassim Haramein explains about the "Vector Equilibrium" connected with the 64 Tetrahedron grid. 

The Rhombic Dodecahedron formed by diamond-shaped faces is inscribed in the Vector Equilibrium also known as "Cube Octahedron." The Vector Equilibrium would be a most fundamental geometric form which combines with the 64 Tetrahedron grid maintaining in balance and symmetry the multi-directional forces at the Zero Point energy or Quantum Vacuum. It would also connect energetically and informationally all of the physical universe in a fractal manner where toroids as vortices circulate going within and coming without physical manifestation.  

Each point of the Rhombic Dodecahedron points to a face of the Vector Equilibrium or Cube Octahedron and both geometric forms complement each other. But the Rhombic Dodecahedron not only is inscribed in the Vector Equilibrium or Cube Octahedron but it also is the “shadow” or 3D geometrical projection of the Tesseract hypercube in 4D. 

In all of these cases we are still speaking only of "spatial dimensions" and these types of dimensions should not be confused with whole physical and non-physical realities. Technically speaking “dimension” is not synonymous with “reality,” plane of existence or anything like that.  It is a necessary parameter (offering restriction and possibility) within a reality system.

According to messages received by another contactee friend of mine (Luis Fernando Mostajo), there would be a dodecahedron at the center of the Earth. 

Now, the geometric “dual” of the rhombic dodecahedron is the Cube Octahedron and the Cube Octahedron is the “shadow” or lower dimensional 3D projection of the 4D Tesseract. This is analogous to how a 2D hexagon is the shadow of a 3D cube.

Could we be receiving or becoming aware of the first steps on how to use geometries that allow connections of vortices situated between physical and non-physical realities? That is, between the mental and the physical realms? 

Perhaps the nodes where lines cross in a 4D Tesseract correspond (in lower  3D spatial projections) to some of Earth’s so-called “power points.” These nodes would also point to the faces of an even higher dimensional 5D form which would not only relate with matter and energy but with information according to the physical theory  of Burkhardt Heim (pointed out to me by Mr. James Fellow). Heim's theory proposes spatial dimensions for concrete matter, for energy levels, and for information.  

Visualizing a Tesseract in specific ways on specific spots of the Earth and in a group - coherent ways may be a means for consciousness to access the information level that would, in turn, connect with the concrete physical level.

Monday, September 5, 2016

Modifying G + other alleged discoveries through the Relativistic Dimensional Analysis of Dr. José Álvarez López

I have an interesting scientific paper dating from 1961 and written by the late Professor José Álvarez López  (PhD in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics from the Universidad de La Plata, Argentina. He died in 2007 at the age of 93) . The work involves the modification of G (the Gravitational Constant), determining atomic constants through a form of relativistic dimensional analysis and more.


Many decades ago, Dr. Álvarez López was known as one of the few persons knowledgeable in General Relativity in Argentina (and in the world). He briefly worked at Lawrence Livermore and self published several theoretical propositions and alleged findings that -in my view- still need to be carefully peer reviewed. 

I have a rather succinct publication written by Álvarez López and which might be of interest. It is titled "Relativistic Dimensional Analysis" and claims that by modifying G dividing it by 1- v2/c2 and placing this modified G in Lagrange equations, we arrive to Einstein's equations for planetary motion. He also proposes that Eötvöss' experiments focused upon a relation that could qualify as 'masses at rest'. He claims that Eötvöss' experiments say nothing in regard to the relativistic behavior of masses in relative motion. Álvarez López's work may shed some conceptual light on the apparent 'antigravity' results more recently obtained in torsion experiments in which perhaps our understanding of the Equivalence Principle may have to be modified. Since José Álvarez Lopez´s key ideas date back to 1947, if proven correct or essentially sound, they should be recognized even after death.

His work also delves into a distinction between universal and empirical constants and a relativistic dimensional method for arriving through deduction to a list of values very closely corresponding to the atomic constants. Moreover, by setting either the simultaneity of space or of time when using Lorenzian transformations, apparently two sets of indeterminate or ambivalent relativistic results come up for time and for length. 

In relation to this ambivalence in relativistic formulas and in a personal conversation which took place in Paris with count Louis de Broglie, Dr. Álvarez López was told to distinguish between the "time of waves" and the "time of corpuscles." In my layman's view this seems to connect aspects of General Relativity with Quantum Physics.

I think that, since Álvarez López extolled Tolman's 'Principle of Similitude' and also his own 'Principle of Variational Homegeneity' and had the courage to delve into some rather forgotten aspects of physics, his work was only privately well-regarded by a few distinguished scientists. 

For example, he was interested in the role of the adimensional or non-dimensional 'constant' alpha and of invariant principles connected to the epistemological possibility of carefully developing an a priori, deductive way of practicing science, a rational-platonic way that would complement the empirical approach.

Due to a recognition of the possibility of developing an aprioristic, deductive type of physics based on general principles, some of Dr. Álvarez López's work seems adequate to add to a discussion about the role of Interiority and meaning in Physics, a science that has mostly focused upon Exteriority and objects. This could further a way to deal with the fundamental role - or perhaps inevitable - of consciousness in the physical universe.

In my conversations with Dr. Álvarez López, he told me that he had conducted research at the Electrophysical Technical Institute under the direction of professor Köning in Munich, Germany; at the Institute for Advanced Studies, directed by professor James Mc Connell in Dublin, Ireland; and at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, in Berkeley, California, where he had been invited by professor Luis W. Alvarez in 1975 to research the “Behavior of Joule’s Law in Electrical Coronas.” There also were favorable personal or letter exchanges with scientists like Alexander Wilkens, Burnington Brown, David Bohm, William R. Corliss, Kiril Stanjukovich, J.L. Synge and Dr. de Puymorin, former director of France’s Space Commission.

Perhaps, Álvarez López's ideas may still be useful to enhance current investigations. I'm only trying to share this possibility asking proper scientists to review it. This particular publication "Relativistic Dimensional Analysis" is 20 pages long, translated into English (
with some typos) and is rather easy to read. It includes some clear equations. If you care to take a look at this material please inform me.

Thank you very much.

Yours truly,
Giorgio Piacenza

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Scalar Waves

Scalar Waves: What could they Be?
By 
Giorgio Piacenza 


Nikola Tesla showed he could send electrical energy without wires. It turned out not to be good for business and it was also classified.  He used longitudinal waves. The field pointer travel in the direction of propagation, much like sound waves and plasma waves do. Their potential is “scalar” but longitudinal wave vectors can be produced from them.  However, they are simply called “scalar waves.” They can be used to send both information and energy. They could be used to heal or to alter a person or perhaps even an entire community. They can be imprinted with information patterns. They cannot be shielded by Faraday cages and apparently go through matter similar to neutrinos. They may even acquire neutrinos and gain energy from them as Dr. Konstantine Meyl posits. Dr. Meyl has reproduced Tesla's technology of generating electric scalar waves and demostrates it. He also enhanced Maxwell's equations and discovered magnetic scalar waves which may affect biological systems and be used by them to communicate with lettle or no "noise."


These 'scalar' longitudinal waves have closed field lines and cannot be easily detected. These longitudinal waves apparently acquire energy from the vacuum as they propagate so the possibility of extracting extra energy from our link as an open system to the vacuum of space, allowing for an (improperly called) “free energy,” exists. Their Poynting vector would coincide with the direction of propagation and - as a particulate aspect - we can visualize them as hidden vortical pulses themselves made of standing vortices and counter vortices.…perhaps expressions of a dynamic double torus geometry multi-fractal level connection and dynamism allowed by Nassim Haramein’s 64 tetrahedron grid and the isotropic vector matrix and vector equilibrium exchange of information and energies beyween deep and exterior levels in the quantum vacuum.


Perhaps, as Dr. Steven Greer says, an object can be made to resonate using high voltage, high frequency, low amperage electric energy field, being affected so as to tilt outside of spacetime (its spin?) and made to disappear into another “dimension.” I think that what Dr. Greer calls “dimension” actually is another "parallel" physical reality system stemming from a different ratio of how Subtle-Mental and Physical Realms combine. Perhaps the type of Poynting vector and electric field used to achieve this effect derives from using electric scalar waves. Energy moving in the direction of propagation is more convergent and may go back into the center of the zero-point vortex. Perhaps the Hutchinson Effect is also based on producing a scalar field and effects taking place by means of – for instance – a specific interference or space-time/time-space mutually canceling “clash” of static and alternating current fields.   
   

Scalar waves travel faster than light and their variable speed would primarily depend on wavelength and frequency modulation and other factors would be vacuum permittivity and (I suppose) the virtual particle energetic density of the quantum vacuum. 


Scalar waves provide communication between the transmitter and receiver as a single whole system. The transmitter “knows” if the receiver is on.  Through resonance the receiver acquires electrical energy can operate a motor or light a LED without being hooked to an external power source or a battery. I think that these waves may have a negentropic effect and serve to collect “negative energy states” that could help us to open worm holes, distort space time metric through crystalline (and quasi crystals?) ring toroidal capacitor, and/or making them (similar to plasma waves as per their equations) rotate and counter-rotate producing a specific gravity-cancelling resonant frequency.  These scalar component, its vector vortices would exist as an inside component in the overall electromagnetic structure and were even considered possible in Maxwell’s original equations (formulated in his “quaternions” with one real and three imaginary components) but were simplified by Oliver Heaviside in which the vector for scalar field was made  = 0.


With the over-simplification, the possibility of contacts with realities beyond 3 spatial and 1 time-forward dimensions was “normalized.” Something similar happened with the dismissal of the negative square root solution of the Klein-Gordon equation and to a few other counter-intuitive (non-classical) but probably valid proposals in physics. As Dr. Scott Virden Anderson mentions in his “Putting Subtle Energies on the Scientific Map” QUATERNIONS (associated with the loss of commutation algebraic and geometric properties and with autopoietic or self- organizing and self-maintaining systems) may be used to describe the first levels of subtle energy (in between the physical and higher realms). Also, even more complex algebras (like octonions and sedenions) may also be appropriate to represent still higher/deeper subtle realms.  http://www.svamd.com 


As Thomas Bearden and Konstantine Meyl explain, electrodynamic textbooks repeat the simplification and preserve limited future scientific developments and scientists have been repeating that ever since. In my view, it goes along with a temporary tendency and taboo against anything not corresponding classical intuitive perceptions but this can be overcome. The longitudinal waves were suppressed and speed-of-light-limit-obeying (spacetime limited) transversal Hertzian waves have been used in technological applications until today. Thus, in relation to the competing views between Tesla and Hertz, Hertz won the day for the conventional ‘vanilla’ (other realities, the “paranormal” and parapsychology-rejecting) 'scientific' and conventionally educated world. 

The longitudinal waves can be considered as standing wave vortices and I believe more like the counter-rotating, less visible vortex accompanying – for instance – tornadoes. They would be like the 'insides' of the exterior quadrants of Integral Theory. 


The scalar component may possibly relate more directly not only with negentropy but with retrocausal influences allowed in quantum-relativistic Klein-Gordon equation. They might be a key to increasing the symmetry  between Direct Space Time and Reciprocal Time Space  by allowing access to the latter, information-frequency predominant domain, including its negentropic qualities. By harnessing the negentropic – normally hidden – aspect we might cancel spacetime and return parts of it to its origin in the non-physical Subtle-Mental (astral) Realm. This could be done in various ratios (allowing greater interaction with that more fundamental realm) or perhaps it can be done completely to transfer completely outside of spacetime (and its complementary time-space).   



Bibliography

American Anti-Gravity (2009). "The Hutchinson Effect: technical Interview with John Hutchinson." Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9q-T2nuAkI 

Bearden, T.E. (2002). "Energy from the Vacuum." Santa Barbara, Cheniere Press.

Greer, S. (2014). "The Crossing Point of Light." Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6sw17VAJcI 

Haramein, N. (2013). "Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass." http://resonance.is/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1367405491-Haramein342013PRRI3363.pdf 

Hutchinson, J. (2009). "Hutchinson Effect: Objects Levitate, Metals Mutate, Time Travel" Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPYCKySAePQ  

Meyl, K. "Scalar waves Theory and Experiments"
Retrieved from http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/Scalar-Waves.pdf  

Pandora's Box (2014). "Nassim Haramein, The structure of the Vacuum and Crop Circles" Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LDSk-g3wKA 



Friday, January 11, 2013

Possibility of Self-Propulsion in UFOs, Non Equivalence and Interpenetration


Possible Disparity between the Inertial and Gravitational Masses in Einstein’s Formulas, according to Professor Jose Alvarez Lopez, PhD. Can this Lead to the Possibility of Self-Propulsion and the Interpenetration of Integral Theory's Quadrants?
By
Giorgio Piacenza Cabrera
Are two equal masses completely equivalent if one is at rest and the other is accelerating or perhaps in a rotational movement? Is the Gravitational Constant really a true constant and unchanging? In this article, I inform that by correcting the Gravitational Constant and then introducing it to Lagrange’s equations for planetary motion Jose Alvarez Lopez PhD, apparently came up with Einstein’s correct equations for planetary motion. Thus, G at motion or changing position (applicable to inertial mass) would not be equivalent to G at rest (as gravitational mass).This would allow the possibility of self-propulsion which, in turn, might be linked to the Subtle Realm relational logic that would allow characteristics of opposite quadrants to interpenetrate. In this case the intelligence of the left quadrants in Ken Wilber’s “Integral Theory” might be able to organize objective, physical structures under what is known as “autopoiesis.”   
Professor Jose Alvarez Lopez (1914-2007) held PhD’s in mathematics, Physics and Chemistry from the University of La Plata, Argentina. In 1956 he personally published in Cordoba, Argentina “The Time Concept in Special Relativity,” “The Concept of Mass in General Relativity,” “The Principle of Variational Homogeneity” and “The Meaning of the Clock Paradox.” In 1961 he published “Relativistic Dimensional Analysis.” Then in 1968, Alvarez Lopez published “Gravitational Interference in the Einstein Effect” and “La Thesis Electromagnetique de Poincaré-Cremieux” (with the Faculty of Sciences at the University of Röen). In 1972 was published “Relativistic Space Propulsion” (also in Cordoba, Argentina) and in 1976 “About the Non Existence of Electronic Inertia in Metallic Conductors” (with the Real Academia de las Ciencias, Madrid, Spain).
This Professor was keenly aware of the epistemological issues raised by modern physics and didn’t hesitate to tackle them as an experimentalist, a deductive physicist, a mathematician and even by adventuring into less scientifically orthodox areas of knowledge. For instance, besides orthodox works in physics, he also wrote about more speculative matters such as Yoga, Cybernetics, Archeology, and about the profound but unappreciated mathematical, engineering and astronomical knowledge apparently possessed by the ancient Hebrews and Egyptians. As expected in a scientifist world, this got him in trouble with many of his colleagues.
Many years ago, during a series of interviews I enjoyed with Professor Alvarez Lopez in Miami, Florida in Icho Cruz, Cordoba, Argentina, Professor Alvarez Lopez  told me that he had conducted research under the direction of Professor Giorgio Piccardi at the Laboratory of the Institute of Chemistry and Physics in Florence, Italy. He also told me that he had conducted research at the Electrophysical Technical Institute under the direction of professor Köning in Munich, Germany; at the Institute for Advanced Studies, directed by professor James Mc Connell in Dublin, Ireland; and in the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, in Berkeley, California, where he had been invited by professor Luis W. Alvarez in 1975 to research the “Behavior of Joule’s Law in Electrical Coronas.” He also informed me that he had received positive commentaries from Albert Einstein (shortly before his death) and met in Paris with Count Louis de Broglie. There also were favorable personal or letter exchanges with scientists like Alexander Wilkens, Burnington Brown, David Bohm, William R. Corliss, Kiril Stanjukovich, J.L. Synge and Dr. de Puymorin, former director of France’s Space Commission.  
I’m not an accredited physicist but, basically possess a well-informed layman’s concern and -in reporting on some of my conversations with Professor Jose Alvarez Lopez- I’m trying to bring up ideas which may still be important to the physics community and, subsequently, to science, metaphysics and philosophy in general. Perhaps the ideas were too controversial during the Professor Alvarez Lopez’s lifetime but nowadays a paradigm like the “Equivalence Principle” is being questioned. Professor Alvarez Lopez did manage to publish some of his ideas in Argentina and non-English speaking countries but, while recognized by some, was (perhaps due to his metaphysical and epistemological interests) also considered to be too extravagant by others who didn’t have the time or the inclination to carefully read his work and review it.  However, perhaps the Professor’s work could still nowadays add to our knowledge of the possibility of manipulating how objects respond to gravity or exert gravitational forces.  For instance, I ask (hoping not to venture into the nonsensical) whether the General Relativity formulas (under a modified Gravitational Constant) allow for an asymmetry between inertial and gravitational masses so that now a Coulomb Effect in rotational masses might become a self-propulsive distortion of space-time. Perhaps some kind of directional space-time torsion field producing an effective vector force could be generated.
There were interesting reports of alleged discoveries. For instance, during some personal meetings, Professor Alvarez Lopez told me that he and his group of experimentalists in Argentina had developed a micrometer that had shown that electrons didn’t possess mass in electrical conductors. He had also apparently found that the atomic constants were coordinated by the non- dimensional ‘atomic constant’ “alpha,” also known as the “Fine Structure Constant.” Moreover, after learning about a strange experimental effect in Argentina in which (after pumping DC current for several days along an ‘antenna’ aligned with the local geomagnetic field) the total output of energy seemed greater than the input, and Alvarez Lopez allegedly conducted a partially related experiment at Lawrence Livermore under the auspices of Dr. Luis W. Alvarez.     
Certainly, I’m not a physicist but for several decades I’ve been pondering and gradually learning about a few relevant issues in philosophy of science and have read a broad range of popular books on quantum physics and cosmology. I hope that, in reporting on some of these conversations with Professor Jose Alvarez Lopez, I’ll bring to the attention of suitable academics ideas which –if confirmed true- could be fundamentally important to science, metaphysics, ontology, philosophy and humanity in general.
I would like to present some of Professor Alvarez Lopez’s alleged findings that also seem to connect Einstein’s Special and General Relativity. I’m would like to see knowledgeable physicists review the Professor’s works (like “Relativistic Dimensional Analysis”) and verify or discard if he was correct in concluding that Einstein overlooked a certain disparity between Inertial Mass and Gravitational Mass. The 1961 publication titled “Relativistic Dimensional Analysis" explains much better than I many of his ideas in relation to the issues raised. It is a matter of finding this and other works to carefully review them.
Here I also want to make reference to research papers dealing with the possibility that orthodox concepts about gravity and the Equivalence Principle can be modified, complemented or challenged. For instance, an article written by Japanese physicists Hideo Hayasaka and Sakae Takeuchi titled “Anomalous Weight Reduction on a Gyroscope’s Right Rotations about the Vertical Axis on the Earth” published in the December 18, 1989 issue of Physical Review Letters. Seems to show that charged rotating masses alter the gravitational field.
I also found that the results reported by Hayasaka and Takeuchi had been questioned in 1990 by Dr. S.H. Salter, a mechanical engineer at the University of Edinburgh who, (while not trying to replicate the original findings with a similar amount of magnetic material also used) proposed that vibrations in the ball bearings of the rotating gyro could explain the effects. Reference: S. H. Salter, Nature, (February 4, 1990).
Nevertheless, a few years later, Hideo Hayasaka et al. wrote an article after conducting experiments that seem to back support the results published in 1989. It is titled “Possibility for the Existence of Antigravity: Evidence from a Free-Fall Experiment Using a Spinning Gyro” and was published in Speculations in Science and Technology, 20 (173-181) (1997). The online link is http://www.earthtech.org/experiments/tajmar/papers/Hayasaka%20-%20Possibility%20for%20the%20Existence%20of%20Anti%20Gravity_Evidence%20from%20a%20Free-Fall%20Experiment%20using%20a%20Spinning%20Gyro.pdf     
Moreover, some other experiments seem to corroborate Hayakawa and Takeuchi’s basic results, thus bringing to question the Equivalence Principle. For example, “The Phenomenon of Weight Reduction of a Spinning Wheel,” written by R. Waite for Mechanica: An International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Volume 42, Number 4, 359-364, presents an alleged general validation of the original results.
Then again (and still related to these issues) another article appearing in Physical Review Letters makes the case that the Equivalence Principle may be violated by the action of the still mysterious “Dark Energy.”  The reference is “Dark Energy as a Born-Infeld Gauge Interaction Violating the Equivalence Principle” by A. Füzfa and J.M. Alimi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 061301 (2006). The online link is: http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v97/i6/e061301
Then, can information be the source for space, inertia and gravity? Read Erik P. Verlinde’s plausible and original work 'On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton' 6 January 2010, at http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785  Apparently, the entropy differences among parts in the universe would generate the gravitational force by distributing matter to maximize overall entropy according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. A stronger force would be related with a higher entropic probability.
Could physical information be modified by human intention interacting with an information field? According to the former Stanford University Professor emeritus in Material Science and Engineering, William A. Tiller PhD, the gauge symmetry of space can be modified like this. Perhaps this would affect information and, if information is the primary source, then –perhaps- space, time, gravity and inertia as emergent phenomena would also be modified. Read the “white papers” and the “Tiller Model” or watch an interesting interview at  http://www.tillerfoundation.com/
The Gravitational Coupling (adimensional) Constant (GCC) comes to mind as it pertains to how charged particles with mass attract. It is the square of the electron mass in Planck units of mass while alpha is the square of the electron charge in Planck units of charge. The parallels with alpha are interesting but GCC links gravity to charge and should be crucial in the more recent investigations on the origin of mass.
 
These 'constants' (which as 'pure numbers' can be seen as 'stable' and 'prior' in relation to constants using units of measurement)  may be conceived not as 'true constants' but as modulators of those constants. Their change would also modify the Gravitational Constant. Interestingly, Alvarez Lopez also proposed that G could be relativistically corrected dividing it by 1 - v square/c square. If I'm interpreting this correctly, this could mean that the equivalence principle for two objects in relative motion with each other would have to be modified. Professor Alvarez Lopez then placed the corrected G into a Lagrange equation and arrived at Einstein's equation for planetary motion. He then wrote that "this showed that Einstein correction consisted exactly in transforming the Constant of Gravitation into a Lorentzian invariant." Here again we see Alvarez Lopez´s search for the interplay between a 'prior' factor and a 'dependent' factor.
 
In "Relativistic Dimensional Analysis" there’s a claim that by modifying G (dividing it by 1- v2/c2 and placing this modified G in Lagrange equations) we arrive to Einstein's equations for planetary motion. Alvarez Lopez also proposed that Eötvoss' experiments testing the Equivalence Principle focused upon a relation that could qualify as 'masses at rest'. He claimed that Eötvoss' experiments say nothing in regards to the relativistic behavior of masses in relative motion. 
Professor Alvarez Lopez told me that Einstein’s General Relativity Theory was “a perfect theory based upon two errors: 1. The equivalence between inertial and gravitational mass, which he tacitly assumed and 2. The constancy of the Gravitational Constant, which he also tacitly assumed.” Then he asserted that “the error about the Equivalence Principle corrects the error about the Gravitational Constant.
G0 (corrected Gravitational Constant) =   G/(1-v^2 /c^2 )       Then, according to Alvarez Lopez, if G0 is utilized in Lagrange’s formula we obtain Einstein’s formula for planetary motion, a formula that took Einstein 20 pages of tensorial calculus to obtain. Professor Alvarez Lopez also said that “this shows that it is easier to arrive to the same results by starting from Electrodynamics and moving to General Relativity because √(1-v^2  c^2 )  is obtained from Special Relativity which pertains to Electrodynamics. Einstein achieved the formulas but not the theory.” 
Thus, Professor Alvarez Lopez also discovered that Einstein was using two kinds of masses: The relative mass of Special Relativity, where mass is a function of velocity and the absolute mass of General Relativity, in which the mass is constant and, therefore, independent of velocity.
Regarding Length, if L = length at rest L_0= Length during movement L = L_0 √(1-v^2/c^2 )             L< L_0
Regarding Time (alternative equation) T= T_0 √(1-v^2/c^2 )
Also, if G were constant, the formula for the gravitational force would be equivalent to the formula of the centrifugal force so that F = G (m M)/r^2  = m w^2 r
Jose Alvarez Lopez’s work delves into a distinction between universal and empirical constants and goes into a relativistic dimensional method for arriving (through a method and deduction) to a list of values very closely corresponding to the atomic constants. Moreover, by setting the simultaneity of Space or of Time when using Lorentzian transformations, two sets of indeterminate or ambivalent relativistic results for time and for length result. In relation to this ambivalence in relativistic formulas and in a personal conversation with Count L. de Broglie, Professor Alvarez Lopez was told that it was important to distinguish between the "time of waves" and the "time of corpuscles." In my layman's understanding this seems to connect aspects of General Relativity with Quantum Physics.
 I think that, since Professor Alvarez Lopez admired Tolman's “Principle of Similitude” and used his own (also quite interesting) “Principle of Variational Homogeneity” and had the courage to delve into some unclearly settled aspects of physics, his work was only privately well-regarded by a few distinguished scientists. For instance Professor Alvarez Lopez was interested in the role of the adimensional 'constant' alpha and of invariant principles connected to the epistemological possibility of carefully developing an a priori, Platonic, rational method that would complement the empirical approach.
Also, Professor Alvarez Lopez claimed that by introducing in the practice of Dimensional Analysis his “Principle of Dimensional Homogeneity” the possibility of determining a priori the constants of nature comes up. Due to this recognition of the possibility of an aprioristic, deductive physics based on general principles, some of Professor Alvarez Lopez’s work seems adequate to explore the role of an intelligent interiority in Physics, typically limited to be a “hard science” mostly focused on structured, stable, and objective Exteriority. Perhaps aspects related to an intelligent, physical autopoiesis, to information and, eventually, to the fundamental role of consciousness in the physical universe would relate with this exploration. In relation to a more complex phase of Integral Theory, the importance of considering Interior, Intelligent aspects hiding (or existing in potential states) in the obvious Physical, Exterior, Objective aspects of the Kosmos (rather than expressing as correlated but distinct quadratic perspectives) arises.
In Jose Alvarez Lopez’s 1961 work titled Relativistic Dimensional Analysis (p.58) we read:
“Tolman proved that with his Principle of Similitude the aprioristic qualitative determination of all the laws of Nature was possible. He also pointed out that this was not the case for Newton’s law of gravitation; and the main objection against Tolman’s Principle of Similitude was that with its help the aprioristic determination of Newton’s law of gravitation was impossible. Owing to this circumstance the Principle of Tolman was rejected as a physical principle. It is surprising to observe that nobody, at that time, considered the other possibility: that the “constant” of the gravitational law were not a real constant of Nature.
The equivalence between gravitational mass and inertial mass, implicit in the Newton law of gravitation, has always appeared as demonstrated by the existing isochronism of penduli formed out of different materials. Later on, Eötvoss confirmed the result of the isochronal experiments with the help of the famous balance, demonstrating that the relationship existing between masses of different substances in regard to the gravitational and inertial actions was invariant at the poles and at the equator. Taking into account that at the equator the action of the gravitational force is somewhat opposed by the centrifugal action due to the rotation of the Earth, this experimental demonstration was considered sufficient proof for the statement of a “Principle of Equivalence” of the gravitational and inertial masses.
All these experiments and analyses have been so amply discussed in the scientific literature that it is surprising that nobody observed that the experiments of Eötvoss –regardless of their extreme accuracy- were performed under conditions we could qualify as static ones: i.e. the relationship between the masses (terrestrial mass and the mass in the balance) is referred to masses at rest. This is the reason why Eötvoss’ experiments say nothing in regard to the relativistic behaviour of masses in relative motion (as, for instance, the masses of a planet and the Sun). In face of such facts -I have analyzed at full length in a previous paper (24) – it is hardly dubious that a physicist will not qualify the relativistic applying of such experiments as “illegitimate extrapolations of experimental results.”
We arrive at the conclusion that nobody has demonstrated the “constant” of the gravitational law is really a constant of Nature, and that in spite of this lack of experimental evidence the constancy of such an entity is an accepted fact of modern physics. Let us think of the methodological mistake involved in the rejection of the Principle of Similitude on the basis of its inability for determining a “constant” that nobody has yet shown to be a constant of Nature.”
The English abstract of Jose Alvarez Lopez’s 1957 work El Concepto de Masa en Relatividad General reads:
“In trying to transform trajectories of a configuration space into geodetic lines of a Riemannian space-time, the author has been led to the discovery of an essential requirement
dm/dt=0
(where m represents coordinate mass) which he calls “Principle of Identity.” Its name suggests it to be a generalization of the Newtonian “Principle of Equivalence” that allows the discussion of dynamical conditions hitherto not taken into account in the analysis of the quoted Newtonian principle.
In section c the author shows –with the help of the well-known “Einstein elevator” - that unless we accept a principle of identity it will be possible to distinguish between gravitational and inertial forces.”
Professor Alvarez Lopez was one of the first scientists able to understand Albert Einstein’s theories. While he was recognized by some important established scientists, as a Latin American scientist working independently against prevailing dogmas didn’t allow him to be recognized in earnest. In Relativistic Dimensional Analysis, El Concepto de Masa en Relatividad General, The Principle of Variational Homogeneity and Self-Propulsion: A New Flying Technique (some of which may be available through Borderland Sciences, Amazon and Google Books) there are carefully detailed, cogent explanations with step by step mathematical demonstrations that serious scientists willing to learn plausible important corrections to Einstein’s theories can find.
I’m aware that according to Erik P. Verlinde, Phd, gravity can be thought of as a derived entropic force linked to information and probability as the statistical behavior of ‘degrees of freedom’ which can be pictured as encoded (minus one spatial dimension) within the concept of a ‘holographic screen’. Thus gravity would originate in a difference on how much entropy and information is found in the space between two masses in relation to its surroundings: More entropy, more gravity and the more bits of information are required to unscramble and to explain this entropy (because more bits of information have been ‘lost’) would be equivalent to a greater ‘gravitational pull’. Here inertia, gravity and space would be emergent and information primary.
Whether –from another perspective- this pull is also accompanied by a distortion of space-time and to a concentration or dispersal of elementary ‘information space-time units’ this may also be plausible. To me this suggests that the level of reality capable of modifying how much information is required in order to obtain a practical description is more fundamental. Could this be a higher symmetry level which we can tap into through our awareness and perhaps our very capacity to describe a certain space based on information influences how we modify thermodynamically free information? Can our consciousness connected with quantum non locality decrease entropy? Hopefully physicists knowledgeable of these matters will see if Professor Alvarez Lopez’s work is still useful to current discussions in physics.
For a stimulating read find Erik P. Verlinde’s 'On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton', at http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785
If Professor Alvarez Lopez’s works establish genuine discoveries, they may have many implications. For instance, it may not be possible to adequately define General Relativity in a Riemannian four dimensional space. Perhaps his works agree with the possibility of finding practical ways to increase the disparity between inertial and gravitational masses and therefore of creating unique dynamic effects. Can movement, the Coulomb Effect and vibrational information states be intentionally imprinted/programmed and used to decrease inertia and to tap into zero-point energy potentials in order to manifest controlled self-propulsion?  Might the General Relativity formulas (modified by the inclusion of the non-equivalence of the inertial and gravitational masses) now thus relate with Special Relativity and with Quantum Electrodynamics perhaps allowing an asymmetrical Coulomb Effect to become a self-propulsive distortion of space-time?
Some relevant formulas:
Alvarez Lopez’s Corrected Gravitational Constant  G/√(1-v^2  /c^2 )
 
                       G= √(1-v^2-c^2 )            
 
 L = length at rest L_0= Length during movement
L = L_0 √(1-v^2/c^2 )         L< L_0                                L = f (v)         dL/dt≠0        
 
Alvarez Lopez’s alternative equation L=L_(0 )/ √(1-v^2/c^2 )      L>L_0
 
M=M_0/√(1-v^2/c^2 )         dM/dt≠0     
 
dG/dt≠0
 
T =    T_0/√(1-v^2/c^2 )      T >T_0
Alvarez Lopez’s alternative equation   T= T_0 √(1-v^2/c^2 )       T< T_0
 
 F= G(m M)/r^2                     F= m w^2 r            F= G(m M)/r^2  = m w^2 r    
Dimensions of the Equivalence principle = (Gravitational Mass)/(Inertial Mass) = 0
 
Coulomb’s Formula F= (Q_(1  ) Q_2)/(r^2  )
 
Sources
Alvarez Lopez, Jose (1957). El Concepto de Masa en Relatividad General. Cordoba: Imprenta de la Universidad de Cordoba.
Alvarez Lopez, Jose (1961 ). Relativistic Dimensional Analysis. Cordoba: Instituto de Estudios Avanzados.
Wilber, Ken (2006). Integral Spirituality. Boston: Integral Books.